FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID

Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA

Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod

Ashley Cheung Honold

During oral arguments on Aug. 8, 2023 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.

https://covid19.onedaymd.com/2023/08/doctors-can-prescribe-ivermectin-for.html

“FDA is clearly acknowledging that doctors have the authority to prescribe human ivermectin to treat COVID.

So they are not interfering with the authority of doctors to prescribe drugs or to practice medicine,”

  • rtwinOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    well, i’ve been denied many things over those years because i didn’t get the jab, while seeing our ministers flat out lying (because i knew which Pfizer phase 2/3 trials for pregnant women >18jr were still ongoing at the time).

    And the whole Covid-era was abruptly stopped when Ukraine came, and suddenly nothing about corona?! wtf. who are we kidding.

    Oh… and media calling Bill Gates a philanthropist. What a joke.

    So yes, i’m against the narrative, because it’s been well organized and censored.

    The bashing of HCQ was started of by a fraud piece. The Lancet published that study which made all media go crazy, making all doctors using HCQ out for a quacks and losing/risking their license. Only a few weeks later Lancet retracted that peer reviewed paper of Surgisphere, because “HCQ quacks” looked at the actual data and realized it couldn’t be proper and asked Lancet to audit it. i.e. so much for the mainstream “fact checkers”.

    Similar happened with Ivermectin. (my brother has a strong case for the efficacy of ivermectin with covid19. More on IVM at http://www.flccc.net )

    They’re making sure to crack down on any alternative, because otherwise the EUA/CMA license can’t be approved for the covid19 gene therapy injections.

    And if that’s not all, quite a few instructions went against normal conduct, like;

    • denying lung patients antibiotics and insisting on laying them still, which are both anti-standard practice, as i heard a lung nurse vent.
    • pushing a new medicine Remdesivir while having questionable study outcome.
    • insisting you stay at home and do nothing other than taking Aspirin, thus getting sicker, and when sick enough and getting pneumonia(which is the deadly stage) you go to the hospital possibly on a ventilator.
    • like a HCQ study being setup, ignoring results from the field regarding efficacy increasing combinations & dosage, ignoring suggestions by peers. One study even used toxic dosage, while HCQ safety profile is known for 50 years already.
    • Dutch government pretending the covid-measures(lockdowns etc) were legal while they weren’t. It hadn’t even passed the 1st chamber.

    But let’s not mention the excess mortality going on in some countries, not since covid19, but since the jabs… Media etc is silent for some reason. And in case heart/stroke mortality is reported, they’re making people believe it’s because of warmth🤦‍♂️

    What worries me; The next wave the WHO has everything in place legal wise, and Dutch govt even signed(like many WHO affiliates) to follow WHO mandates(sidestepping our government) whenever WHO calls a self-proclaimed pandemic… And without the mrna-jab(s) you increasingly will be excluded, there’s multiple bodies steering in that direction.