WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world to asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoDo you consider AI art “OC” ?message-squaremessage-square155fedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down18
arrow-up184arrow-down1message-squareDo you consider AI art “OC” ?WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world to asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square155fedilink
minus-squaredill@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down1·edit-21 year ago by looking pieces made by other people to learn Humans do it it’s inspiration. Computers do it it’s theft.
minus-squareClipboards@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down5·1 year agoUnironically yes
minus-squareRikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoI don’t understand people like you. Seems to me like exactly the ones who destroyed machines few centuries ago because they would take our jobs. Turns out they didn’t. And AI will succeed as well and it won’t put as all into unemployment.
minus-squareAccidentalLemming@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoI don’t think it’s that easy. If that were true: me creating a painting imitating the style of Keith Haring would be completely fine a computer creating an impressionist painting not specifically modeled after one artist would be theft In music, things are messy as well: a computer generating a 12-bar blues (a staple of blues music) is theft me creating a song that sounds like Imagine Dragons could have made it is perfectly fine
Humans do it it’s inspiration.
Computers do it it’s theft.
Unironically yes
I don’t understand people like you. Seems to me like exactly the ones who destroyed machines few centuries ago because they would take our jobs. Turns out they didn’t. And AI will succeed as well and it won’t put as all into unemployment.
I don’t think it’s that easy.
If that were true:
In music, things are messy as well: