‘Appeal to Authority’, you can probably trust a scientific consensus about a subject in which they are all experts, but you probably shouldn’t trust an individual expert on a topic for which they are not recognized as an expert.

That in itself is the ad hominem fallacy: you need to judge the claim based on its merits, not the merits of the person making the claim.

For example when David Suzuki talks about climate change and people say “well he’s just a biologist, he’s not qualified!” That may be true but it doesn’t invalidate his statements.

Prior to the 1960s, hardly anybody died of cancer.

Because we didn’t even know what it was, let alone how to detect it.

Everyone in this thread saying shit like that hasn’t tried Linux since 2004

Most of the online guides I’ve found are written under the assumption that you’re already a master at the hobby

I’ve had exactly the opposite experience lol. Most of the stuff out there is dreadfully basic, and if you want detail like scientific comparisons of the strength-weight ratios of different infill patterns, good fuckin luck. Some chum on YouTube will have some half baked experiments and that’s as good as it gets.