Amazing observation!

I will give you the benefit of a doubt and assume that you did not see my request for proof if your claim because it went into the wrong thread. So: Prove your goddamn claim.

Correct

Deflection will not work. You have been called out to BACK UP YOUR GODDAMN MOTHERFUCKING CLAIM. Either do it or accept that you’re a goddamn motherfucking lying sack of dog shit. Super easy, barely an inconvenience.

OR…

It is a contradiction that makes no fucking sense

So YOUR ASSERTION is that all the ads say “No Kings Day, brought to you by WalMart!” but they’re offended by ONE ad (in a publication that MAGA hates and would never pay to see) and that might possibly cost them the MAGA patronage?

Explain this. In detail. Fully.

deleted by creator

Hey just curious who was the administration in charge at that time??

Apparently it does not, in the context that you claim.

I have not seen this.

“funded by the Waltons”

Would be MUCH more effective if all the protesters were armed.

The lesson from A Handmaid’s Tale is don’t protest without the arms to back it up.

Your conspiracism is silly but otherwise you’re correct

HEY EVERYBODY!..“you first” is absolutely NOT the flex you think it is.