![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/367855b9-f175-4b68-a9c1-aeeb8c3f8319.png)
How is it tricky? You keep the voltage constant. If the current exceeds the maximum, you first keep the current constant.
How is it tricky? You keep the voltage constant. If the current exceeds the maximum, you first keep the current constant.
What do you actually need? 1 microsecond with “decent bit” is not exactly a lot of information. An oscilloscope would fit that perfectly. How do they not work how you want them to? Who told you that you need something else?
It is in no way tricky. Simply apply a constant voltage.
What you are talking about is nothing special at all and not following a charging curve. The curve automatically looks the way it does when charging CCCV. Constant Current -> Constant Voltage.
Get a board with a TP5000. Like this one here.
Don’t charge LFP to 4.2 volt! The crude “check voltage and if below 3.6 V keep charging” is okay too as long as the maximum current is within battery spec. But measure while charging, don’t turn that off to measure the open circuit voltage.
This is by far the best option for awkward connectors. You could even remove the pins and put the new cables in by opening the crimp and soldering the new ones without any splice.
Is energy efficiency of any concern?
Very interesting. But note that toughness is not a very meaningful metric for fibers. Nobody is wearing kevlar or dyneema clothes.
Given that silk is already established but fairly nich, I assume the same will happen for this fibre. Maybe it can replace kevlar, I don’t know enough to say if that is realistic. Thermal stability will not be nearly as good, stiffness is unknown. Anyone got deeper insights?
Why is there only one without red eyes? Obviously 2 wins then. 1 and 3 are almost exactly the same, except that 3 knows what it is doing and 1 is like ??
But to be honest they are all not spectacular.
Perfect.