Akasazh@lemmy.mltoasklemmy@lemmy.ml•Fast food go-ers of Lemmy, what are your "usual" orders?English
1·
1 year agoThnx!
Thnx!
What are impossible sliders?
Leisure Suit Larry
Ken sent me
It takes leather balls to play rugby
Lubbers
That last sentence made me crack up
Joe cartoon!
C/angryupvote
A modicum of wit and morals would do me nicely.
Neither, really. I can see the appeal of both, but would not have one of either myself. I married a lady that came with a cat, though, so technically more of a cat person.
For me as well. Just under 5000 hrs. Played etf2l, met some great people, went to some lans. Great game.
I can understand that, I like his style ususally. But that’s point of my disappointment. As a historian I cannot see it apart from the historical events. But the crowd reaction is what really freaked me out, it’s scary if you think of it.
It may have. I think the true brilliance of the movie is how the audience, due to framing, can be induced to condone the killing of innocents. I sincerely hope that wasn’t actually Tarantino’s intention.
For instance the soldier killed by the bear jew refused to give up military secrets under threat of death. He chooses te respectfully refuse and is then killed. Framed differently in lots of war movies this is a heroic act.
But here people then cheer when te bear jew comes out and finishes him off.
All of this is an actual war crime.
Indeed and I know, it’s all a bit of good fun. I just can separate it from the very real and very deadly seriousness of this part of history. That was what the main question of this thread was about.