Also, seems kind of scary that this implies a future where so many people are in prison that their vote could actually tip the balance ?

  • cryomancer20x6@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe it to be a short-sited thing, but honestly necessary. This is due to the very large range of federal convictions. It goes from having some pot on you, to armed robbery and murder. I don’t agree that those things should necessarily (case by case) include the same voting restrictions, but there is no way the US government is going to take the time to separate the “worse” crimes from the “lesser”. And, as has been mentioned before the goal of the US penal system is (sadly) not rehabilitation. As long as the government has that attitude, it will never change. You lose more than just the right to vote as a felon, btw. The rights most often curtailed include the right to vote and hold public office, employment rights, domestic rights, and financial and contractual rights.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      You still don’t explain why it’s, in your opinion, necessary to remove voting rights.

      You put that it they shouldn’t remove those for small infractions, but that the administration can’t decide on a line where voting restrictions should be put, and therefore just blanket bans every from from voting.

      Also it’s somehow ok that after people have finished their punishment, they should be punished some more by stripping them off even more rights.

      All of that greatly reduces chances of rehabilitation and keeps criminals in the criminal sector. I fail to see why even minor infractions should lead to lifelong consequences.

      • cryomancer20x6@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s necessary because our government is stupid, slow, and can’t make great choices. I should have clarified that it is deemed necessary by the government because they’ll never make the decisions to back it up. I don’t like it, and I never will. I typed that from the flawed perspective of government and should have worded it better.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see, thnx for the clarification. It seemed like you were indeed supporting said practise.

    • Hogger85b@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It already separates crimes by sentancing. in the UK if your prison sentence is less than 2 years then you can vote from prison. (Also once your have served your time (including being out on probation/license) you can vote.